Jump to content

Richat Structure

Coordinates: 21°06′53″N 11°23′39″W / 21.114700°N 11.394300°W / 21.114700; -11.394300
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Richat Structure
قلب الريشات‎
Tagense[1]
Dome
Image from the International Space Station, 17 December 2011
Image from the International Space Station, 17 December 2011
Richat Structure is located in Mauritania
Richat Structure
Richat Structure
Location within Mauritania
Richat Structure is located in Africa
Richat Structure
Richat Structure
Location within Africa
Coordinates: 21°06′53″N 11°23′39″W / 21.114700°N 11.394300°W / 21.114700; -11.394300
LocationAdrar Plateau of the Sahara
Part ofAdrar Region, Mauritania
Native nameقلب الريشات‎

The Richat Structure, or Guelb er Richât (Arabic: قلب الريشات, romanized: Qalb ar-Rīšāt, Hassaniyya: [galb er.riːʃaːt] ⓘ), is a prominent circular geological feature in the Adrar Plateau of the Sahara. It is located near Ouadane in the Adrar Region of Mauritania. In Hassaniya Arabic, rīšāt means feathers and it is also known locally in Arabic as tagense, referring to the circular opening of the leather pouch that is used to draw water from local wells.[1]

It is an eroded geological dome, 40 kilometres (25 mi) in diameter caused by a subsurface igneous intrusion deforming the overlying sedimentary rock layers, causing the rock to be exposed as concentric rings with the oldest layers exposed at the centre of the structure. Igneous rock is exposed inside and there are rhyolites and gabbros that have undergone hydrothermal alteration, and a central megabreccia. The structure is also the location of exceptional accumulations of Acheulean Paleolithic stone tools. It was selected as one of the 100 geological heritage sites identified by the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) to be of the highest scientific value.[2]

Description

[edit]
Cross section of the structure. Magenta is the volcanic intrusion, while purple, green and grey represent sedimentary layers

The Richat Structure is a deeply eroded, slightly elliptical dome with a diameter of 40 kilometres (25 mi). The sedimentary rock exposed in this dome ranges in age from Late Proterozoic within the center of the dome to Ordovician sandstone around its edges. The sedimentary rocks composing this structure dip outward at 10–20°. Differential erosion of resistant layers of quartzite has created high-relief circular cuestas. Its center consists of a siliceous breccia covering an area that is at least 30 kilometres (19 mi) in diameter.[3][4][5]

Satellite picture of the Richat Structure (false colour)

Exposed within the interior of the Richat Structure is a variety of intrusive and extrusive igneous rocks. They include rhyolitic volcanic rocks, gabbros, carbonatites and kimberlites. The rhyolitic rocks consist of lava flows and hydrothermally altered tuffaceous rocks that are part of two distinct eruptive centers, which are interpreted to be the eroded remains of two maars. According to field mapping, aeromagnetic, and gravimetric data, the gabbroic rocks form two concentric ring dikes. The inner ring dike is about 30 metres (98 ft) in width, 3 kilometres (1.9 mi) from the center of the Richat Structure. The outer ring dike is about 70 metres (230 ft) in width, 8 kilometres (5.0 mi) from the center of the structure.[6] Thirty-two carbonatite dikes and sills have been mapped within the structure. The dikes are generally about 300 metres (980 ft) long and typically 1 to 4 metres (3.3 to 13.1 ft) wide. They consist of massive carbonatites that are mostly devoid of vesicles. The carbonatite rocks have been dated as having cooled between 94 and 104 million years ago. A kimberlitic plug and several sills have been found within the northern part of the structure. The kimberlite plug has been dated to around 99 million years old. These intrusive igneous rocks are interpreted as indicating the presence of a large alkaline igneous intrusion that currently underlies the structure and was created by uplifting the overlying rock.[3][4][7][8]

Topographic map of Guelb el Richat. Elevation in meters. 10 m contour interval with major contour line every 50 m

Spectacular hydrothermal features are a part of the Richat Structure. They include the extensive hydrothermal alteration of rhyolites and gabbros and a central megabreccia created by hydrothermal dissolution and collapse. The siliceous megabreccia is at least 40 metres (130 ft) thick in its center to only a few meters thick along its edges. The breccia consists of fragments of white to dark gray cherty material, quartz-rich sandstone, diagenetic cherty nodules, and stromatolitic limestone and is intensively silicified. The hydrothermal alteration, which created this breccia, has been dated to have occurred about 98.2 ± 2.6 million years ago using the 40Ar/39Ar method.[3][4][8]

Interpretation

[edit]

The structure was first described in the 1930s to 1940s, as Richât Crater or Richât buttonhole (boutonnière du Richât). Richard-Molard (1948) considered it to be the result of a laccolithic uplift.[9] A geological expedition to Mauritania led by Théodore Monod in 1952 recorded four "crateriform or circular irregularities" (accidents cratériformes ou circulaires) in the area, Er Richât, Aouelloul (south of Chinguetti), Temimichat-Ghallaman and Tenoumer.[10] It was initially considered to be an impact structure (as is clearly the case with the other three), but a closer study in the 1950s to 1960s suggested that it might instead have been formed by terrestrial processes. After field and laboratory studies in the 1960s, no significant evidence was found for shock metamorphism or other deformation indicative of a hypervelocity extraterrestrial impact.[11] Coesite, an indicator of shock metamorphism, was initially reported as being present in rock samples from the structure, but a further analysis in 1969 concluded that barite had been misidentified as coesite.[12] Work on dating the structure was done in the 1990s.[13] A study of the formation of the structure by Matton, et al. (2005, 2008) concluded it was not an impact structure.[3][4]

Further analysis of deep structure underneath the surface, including with aeromagnetic and gravimetric mapping,[6] concluded that the structure is the result of ring faults which led to gabbroic ring dikes over a large intrusive body of magma, and the uplifting and later erosion of a dome, through intense hydrothermal activity through the fractured substructure. This can form cuestas over time through the differential erosion of the resulting alternating hard and soft rock layers.[6] The underlying alkaline igneous complex exposed through erosion dates to the Cretaceous period.[a]

IUGS geological heritage site

[edit]

In respect of it being "a spectacular example of a magmatic concentric alkaline complex", the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) included the Richat Structure in its assemblage of 100 geological heritage sites around the world, in October 2022. The organisation defines an IUGS Geological Heritage Site as "a key place with geological elements and/or processes of international scientific relevance, used as a reference, and/or with a substantial contribution to the development of geological sciences through history."[2]

Archaeology

[edit]
A topographic reconstruction (scaled 6:1 on the vertical axis) from satellite photos. False colouring as follows:
• Brown: bedrock
• Yellow/white: sand
• Green: vegetation
• Blue: salty sediments

The Richat Structure is the location of exceptional accumulations of Acheulean artifacts.[14][15] These Acheulean archaeological sites are located along wadis that occupy the outermost annular depression of this structure. Pre-Acheulean stone tools also have been found in the same areas. These sites are associated with rubbly outcrops of quartzite that provided the raw material needed for the manufacture of these artifacts. The most important Acheulean sites and their associated outcrops are found along the northwest of the outer ring, from which Wadi Akerdil heads east and Wadi Bamouere to the west. Sparse and widely scattered Neolithic spear points and other artifacts have also been found. However, since these sites were first discovered by Théodore Monod in 1974,[14] mapping of artifacts within the area of the structure have found them to be generally absent in its innermost depressions. So far, neither recognizable midden deposits nor manmade structures have been recognized and reported from the structure. This is interpreted as indicating that the area of the Richat Structure was used for only short-term hunting and stone tool manufacturing. The local apparent wealth of surface artifacts is the result of the concentration and mixing by deflation over multiple glacial-interglacial cycles.[15][16]

Artifacts are found, typically redeposited, deflated, or both, in Late Pleistocene to early Holocene gravelly mud, muddy gravel, clayey sand, and silty sand. These sediments are often cemented into either concretionary masses or beds by calcrete. Ridges typically consist of deeply weathered bedrock representing truncated Cenozoic paleosols that formed under tropical environments. The Pleistocene to Middle Holocene sediments occur along wadis as the thin, meter- to less-than-meter-thick accumulations in the interior annular depressions to 3 to 4 metres (9.8 to 13.1 ft)-thick accumulations along the wadis in the outermost annular depression of the structure. The gravelly deposits consist of a mixture of slope scree, debris flow, and fluviatile or even torrential flow deposits. The finer-grained, sandy deposits consist of eolian and playa lake deposits. The latter contain well-preserved freshwater fossils. Numerous concordant radiocarbon dates indicate that the bulk of these sediments accumulated between 15,000 and 8,000 BP during the African humid period. These deposits lie directly upon deeply eroded and weathered bedrock.[16]

Fringe theory of Atlantis site

[edit]

The Richat structure has been the subject of fringe claims to be the site of Atlantis mentioned in the works of Plato.[17][18] This claim is primarily based on the concentric nature of the structure, which superficially matches Plato's description of the city.[19] Most classicists believe that Atlantis was a fictional rhetorical invention by Plato, rather than a real geographic location.[20][21] Skeptic Steven Novella criticised the claim, stating that the structure is inconsistent with Plato's description of Atlantis, and that the site shows no evidence of a city ever being built at the location.[19]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ The breccia core is genetically related to plutonic activity since doming and the production of hydrothermal fluids were instrumental in creating a favorable setting for dissolution. The resulting fluids were also responsible for subsequent silicification and hydrothermal infilling. To the best of our knowledge, karst collapse phenomena at the summit of an alkaline complex are unique but may be more frequent than previously believed.(Matton 2005)

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Richard-Molard, J. (1952). "The Pseudo-boutonniers of Richat". Gouvernement Général de l'Afrique Occidentale Française Bulletin de la Direction des Mines. 15 (2): 391–401.
  2. ^ a b "The First 100 IUGS Geological Heritage Sites" (PDF). IUGS International Commission on Geoheritage. IUGS. Retrieved 3 November 2022.
  3. ^ a b c d Matton, G. (2008). "The Cretaceous Richat Complex (Mauritania); a peri-Atlantic alkaline" (PDF). Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada: Université du Québec à Chicoutimi. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 April 2012. Retrieved 7 September 2011.
  4. ^ a b c d Matton, Guillaume; Jébrak, Michel; Lee, James K.W. (2005). "Resolving the Richat enigma: Doming and hydrothermal karstification above an alkaline complex" (PDF). Geology. 33 (8): 665–68. doi:10.1130/G21542AR.1.
  5. ^ Woolley, Alan Robert (1987). Alkaline Rocks and Carbonatites of the World. Austin. ISBN 0-292-70389-9. OCLC 16448519.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  6. ^ a b c Abdeina, El Houssein; Bazin, Sara; Chazot, Gilles; Bertrand, Hervé; Le Gall, Bernard; Youbi, Nasrrddine; Sabar, Mohamed Salem; Bensalah, Mohamed Khalil; Boumehdi, Moulay Ahmed (3 November 2021). "Geophysical modelling of the deep structure of the Richat magmatic intrusion (northern Mauritania): insights into its kinematics of emplacement". Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 14 (22): 2315. Bibcode:2021ArJG...14.2315A. doi:10.1007/s12517-021-08734-4. ISSN 1866-7538. S2CID 241620488.
  7. ^ Netto, A.M.; Fabre, J.; Poupeau, G.; Champemmois, M. (1992). "Datations par traces de fissions de la structure circulaire des Richats". Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences de Paris. 314: 1179–1186.
  8. ^ a b Matton, Guillaume; Jébrak, Michel (2014). "The 'eye of Africa' (Richat dome, Mauritania): An isolated Cretaceous alkaline–hydrothermal complex". Journal of African Earth Sciences. 97: 109–124. Bibcode:2014JAfES..97..109M. doi:10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.04.006.
  9. ^ Richard-Molard, Jacques (1948). "The Richât Buttonhole in Mauritanian Adrar". Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences. 227: 142.
  10. ^ Cailleux, A. (1962). "El Richat: dôme arasé, surbaissé ou cratère bombé?". Notes Africaines. 93: 27–29.
  11. ^ Dietz, Robert S.; Fudali, Robert; Cassidy, William (1969). "Richat and Semsiyat Domes (Mauritania): Not Astroblemes". Geological Society of America Bulletin. 80 (7): 1367. Bibcode:1969GSAB...80.1367D. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1969)80[1367:RASDMN]2.0.CO;2.
  12. ^ Fudali, R. F. (10 October 1969). "Coesite from the Richat Dome, Mauritania: A Misidentification". Science. 166 (3902): 228–230. Bibcode:1969Sci...166..228F. doi:10.1126/science.166.3902.228. PMID 17731489. S2CID 37249316.
  13. ^ Netto, A.M.; Fabre, J.; Poupeau, G.; Champemmois, M. (1992). "Fission Trace Dates of the Richats Circular Structure". Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences de Paris. 314: 1179–86.
    Poupeau, G.; Fabre, J.; Labrin, E.; Azdimoussa, A.; Netto, A. M.; Monod, T. (1996). "Nouvelles datations par traces de fission de la structure circulaire des Richat (Mauritanie)". Mémoires du Service Géologique de l'Algérie. 8: 231–36.
  14. ^ a b Monod, T. (1975). "Three Pebble Deposits in the Mauritanian Adrar (Western Sahara)". Provence Historique. 99: 87–97.
  15. ^ a b Sao, Ousmane; Giresse, Pierre; de Lumley, Henry; Faure, Olivier; Perrenoud, Christian; Saos, Thibaud; Rachid, Mouamar Ould; Touré, Ousmane Cherif (2008). "The Sedimentary Environments of the Pre-Eulean and Aeulean Deposits of the Akerdil and Bamouéré Wadis (Guelb er-Richât, Adrar, Mauritania), A First Approach". L'Anthropologie. 112 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.anthro.2008.01.001.
  16. ^ a b Giresse, Pierre; Sao, Ousmane; de Lumley, Henry (2012). "Paleo-environmental Study of the Quaternary Sediments of Guelb and Richât (Adrar of Mauritania) with Respect to Neighboring or Associated Sites of the Lower Paleolithic. Discussion and Perspectives". L'Anthropologie. 116 (1): 12–38. doi:10.1016/j.anthro.2011.12.001.
  17. ^ Mark Adams (26 April 2016). Meet Me in Atlantis: Across Three Continents in Search of the Legendary Sunken City. Penguin Publishing Group. p. 203. ISBN 978-1-101-98393-5. Rob Shelsky (23 February 2016). Invader Moon. Simon and Schuster. p. 75. ISBN 978-1-61868-666-4.
  18. ^ "Is this Atlantis, hiding in plain sight in the Sahara?". Newshub. Retrieved 8 November 2023.
  19. ^ a b Novella, Stephen (19 November 2018). "No – Atlantis Has Not Been Discovered in North Africa". NeuroLogica. Retrieved 8 November 2023.
  20. ^ Clay, Diskin (2000). "The Invention of Atlantis: The Anatomy of a Fiction". In Cleary, John J.; Gurtler, Gary M. (eds.). Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy. Vol. 15. Leiden: E. J. Brill. pp. 1–21. ISBN 978-90-04-11704-4.
  21. ^ "As Smith discusses in the opening article in this theme issue, the lost island-continent was – in all likelihood – entirely Plato's invention for the purposes of illustrating arguments around Grecian polity. Archaeologists broadly agree with the view that Atlantis is quite simply 'utopia' (Doumas, 2007), a stance also taken by classical philologists, who interpret Atlantis as a metaphorical rather than an actual place (Broadie, 2013; Gill, 1979; Nesselrath, 2002). One might consider the question as being already reasonably solved but despite the general expert consensus on the matter, countless attempts have been made at finding Atlantis." (Dawson & Hayward, 2016)
[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Richat Structure.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richat_Structure&oldid=1264108080"